[SOLVED] Pulsing doesn't seem to be 100% atomic
|
10-22-2014, 08:52 PM
Post: #6
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Pulsing doesn't seem to be 100% atomic
(10-22-2014 06:41 PM)dgw Wrote: So the solution is throwing away the last (by now) 14 hours of data on each of 3 computers? Doesn't sound like a "fix". A good compromise is to set your computers to autopulse more frequently, and then disable client network communication as soon as the website becomes unreachable (the client does this automatically, but there is also a setting in the client to do this). That way, you won't lose as much data if another service interruption happens. |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
[SOLVED] Pulsing doesn't seem to be 100% atomic - Soulweaver - 10-22-2014, 12:59 PM
RE: Pulsing doesn't seem to be 100% atomic - smitmartijn - 10-22-2014, 02:00 PM
RE: Pulsing doesn't seem to be 100% atomic - Soulweaver - 10-22-2014, 11:05 PM
RE: Pulsing doesn't seem to be 100% atomic - smitmartijn - 10-23-2014, 04:47 PM
RE: Pulsing doesn't seem to be 100% atomic - dgw - 10-22-2014, 02:41 PM
RE: Pulsing doesn't seem to be 100% atomic - smitmartijn - 10-22-2014, 06:33 PM
RE: Pulsing doesn't seem to be 100% atomic - dgw - 10-22-2014, 06:41 PM
RE: Pulsing doesn't seem to be 100% atomic - Inquizitor - 10-22-2014 08:52 PM
RE: Pulsing doesn't seem to be 100% atomic - dgw - 10-22-2014, 09:10 PM
RE: Pulsing doesn't seem to be 100% atomic - dgw - 10-23-2014, 04:17 PM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)